< All Tickers
ZM
Zoom Communications
Earnings
> FY2027Q1 Review
ZM | Earnings Review
| Metric | FY25Q1 | FY25Q2 | FY25Q3 | FY25Q4 | FY26Q1 | FY26Q2 | FY26Q3 | FY26Q4 | FY27Q1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue ($M) | $1.1B | $1.2B | $1.2B | $1.2B | $1.2B | $1.2B | $1.2B | $1.2B | $1.2B |
| Revenue ($M) YoY % | - | - | - | - | +3.0% | +4.6% | +4.4% | +5.3% | +5.4% |
| Enterprise revenue ($M) | $666M | $683M | $699M | $707M | $705M | $731M | $741M | $757M | $756M |
| Enterprise revenue ($M) YoY % | - | - | - | - | +5.9% | +7.0% | +6.0% | +7.1% | +7.2% |
| Online revenue ($M) | $476M | $480M | $479M | $477M | $470M | $487M | $488M | $490M | $483M |
| Online revenue ($M) YoY % | - | - | - | - | -1.3% | +1.5% | +1.9% | +2.7% | +2.8% |
| Enterprise NDR (TTM) | 99.0% | 98.0% | 98.0% | 98.0% | 98.0% | 98.0% | 98.0% | 98.0% | 99.0% |
| Non-GAAP gross margin | 79.3% | 78.6% | 78.9% | 78.8% | 79.2% | 79.8% | 80.0% | 79.8% | 79.9% |
| Non-GAAP operating margin | 40.0% | 39.2% | 38.9% | 39.5% | 39.8% | 41.3% | 41.2% | 39.3% | 41.1% |
| Non-GAAP diluted EPS | $1.35 | $1.39 | $1.38 | $1.41 | $1.43 | $1.53 | $1.52 | $1.44 | $1.55 |
| Non-GAAP diluted EPS YoY % | - | - | - | - | +5.9% | +10.1% | +10.1% | +2.1% | +8.4% |
| FCF margin (non-GAAP) | 49.9% | 31.4% | 38.9% | 35.2% | 39.4% | 41.7% | 50.0% | 27.1% | 40.4% |
ZM is showing a modest but real inflection: revenue growth accelerated to 5.5% (FY27Q1) from 5.3% (FY26Q4), 4.4% (FY26Q3), and 4.7% (FY26Q2) — the fastest growth since the post-pandemic normalization. Enterprise NDR ticked to 99% from a year-long 98% floor. Operating margin at 41.1% and FCF margin at 40.4% are best-in-class for SaaS at this scale. The bear case (Teams bundling structural headwind, Online segment churn) is intact but partially offset by AI monetization scaling (Custom AI Companion, ZVA Receptionist, AI Services) and ZCX growing high-double-digits. Watch items: NDR inflection above 100%, AI revenue disclosure (mgmt deliberately holding back), and the FY27Q2 guide (4.1% YoY) which implies H2 deceleration the company attributes mostly to FX and tougher Online comps.
Beat/Miss
Guidance
Catalysts
Street Q&A
Contradictions
Read-Throughs
| Metric | Consensus | Actual | Variance | Beat/Miss |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1,224M Street / $1,222M guide mid | $1,239M | +$15M / +1.2% vs Street; +$17M vs guide mid | Beat |
| Non-GAAP EPS | $1.42 Street / $1.41 guide mid | $1.55 | +$0.13 / +9.3% vs Street | Beat |
| Non-GAAP gross margin | ~79.4% | 79.9% | +50bps vs Street | Beat |
| Non-GAAP operating margin | ~39.7% | 41.1% | +140bps vs Street | Beat |
| Enterprise NDR (TTM) | 98% | 99% | +1pp — first inflection | Beat |
| FCF | n/a (FCF margin guide) | $500M (40.4% margin) | +8% YoY | Beat |
Pattern: ZM is a consistent beater on EPS (avg +9% over L8Q) with steady ~1–1.5% revenue beats. EPS beat magnitude: FY27Q1 +9.3%, FY26Q4 -3.2% (only miss in 9 quarters — and a small one tied to higher SBC absorption), FY26Q3 +5.6%, FY26Q2 +11.1%, FY26Q1 +9.2%, FY25Q4 +8.1%, FY25Q3 +5.7%, FY25Q2 +14.4%, FY25Q1 +13.5%. The FY27Q1 revenue beat of +1.2% extends the streak of 9 consecutive revenue beats (~1.0–1.6% range). NDR inflection from 98% → 99% is the strongest qualitative signal — mgmt has been telegraphing this for 3+ quarters. L12Q Beat Rate: Revenue ~92%, EPS ~92%.
| Metric | Prior Guide (Feb 2026) | New Guide (May 2026) | Consensus | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Q2 (FY27Q2) | n/a | $1,265M–$1,270M (mid $1,267.5M; +4.1% YoY) | $1,266M | In line with Street; implies modest deceleration from Q1's 5.5% (FX + tougher comps) |
| Non-GAAP EPS Q2 (FY27Q2) | n/a | $1.45–$1.47 (mid $1.46) | $1.49 | $0.03 below Street — conservative pattern |
| Revenue FY27 | $5,065M–$5,075M (mid $5,070M) | $5,080M–$5,090M (mid $5,085M; +4.4% YoY) | $5,082M | Raised $15M; matches Street |
| Non-GAAP EPS FY27 | $5.77–$5.81 (mid $5.79) | $5.96–$6.00 (mid $5.98) | $5.91 | Raised $0.19 / +3.3%; $0.07 above Street |
| FY27 non-GAAP op income | n/a explicit | $2.065B–$2.075B (40.7% margin) | ~$2.02B | Implies ~+50bps op-margin lift vs FY26 |
| FY27 free cash flow | $1.70B–$1.74B | $1.70B–$1.74B (reaffirmed) | $1.71B | Unchanged — translates to ~33.5% FCF margin |
| Q2 deferred revenue YoY | 1–2% | 2–3% | n/a | Up modestly; grace-period dynamics still cause variability |
| Catalyst | Timing | Consensus / Watch | Implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| June 2026 AI product release | June 2026 | Yuan teased "exciting new product/solution announcement next month, all our AI-driven product" | Could re-rate Custom AI Companion narrative if quality jump is meaningful |
| Custom AI Companion expansion | FY27 ongoing | Raymond James ~10,000 seats; MongoDB upgrade; financial-services traction | Monetization path for AI inside Workplace; key to NDR > 100% thesis |
| ZVA Receptionist (Phone AI) | FY27 ongoing | AI-powered call routing; new monetization layer on Phone (mid-teens ARR growth) | Adds AI ARPU lift to Phone book; key to Phone re-acceleration |
| Zoom AI Services (Scribe API) | Launched March 2026 | Top open ASR leaderboard on Hugging Face; BPO/developer adoption (InflexionCX) | Platform-style AI revenue with developer leverage; small base |
| $1B incremental buyback | Authorized May 2026 | On top of $370M remaining; 4.2M shares for $362M repurchased Q1; $7.7B cash | $1.37B total authorization vs ~$24B mkt cap = ~5.7% — supportive of EPS |
| NDR inflection above 100% | Watch FY27 quarters | TTM Enterprise NDR ticked from 98% to 99% in Q1 — first move in 5+ quarters | Single most important fundamental signal — needed for re-rating |
| ZCX share gains | FY27 ongoing | High-double-digit growth, 9 of top 10 ZCX deals included paid AI | Diversification away from UC into CC TAM |
| FY27Q2 print | Late Aug 2026 | Guide $1.265B–$1.27B / $1.45–$1.47 EPS — implies decel + tougher Online comp | Watch enterprise NDR trajectory and AI Companion paid MAU growth |
| Analyst (firm) | Question | Management response | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Zukin (Wolfe) | What changed on deferred revenue (+5% vs 1–2% guide) and broader enterprise billings trend? | Chang: Enterprise diversification, churn improvement, AI monetization all driving durable enterprise growth. Deferred-rev outperformance was because fewer large competitive takeouts required grace-period structures this quarter — those terms are valuable when needed (less discount, longer deals) but mgmt won't take them if not needed. Online churn ticked up nominally to 3% — "don't read too much into it." | Well answered |
| Siti Panigrahi (Mizuho) | How much of the 5.5% revenue accel came from AI monetization vs broader enterprise activity? Why does FY27 guide imply H2 deceleration? | Chang: Some of the upside was FX-driven. Enterprise grew 7.2% (vs 7.1% prior) with a 60bp white-label churn headwind — so true underlying enterprise accel. Online had FX tailwind AND an easier comp (no price increase in prior Q1) — Online decel expected Q2–Q4 of FY27. | Well answered |
| Josh Baer (Morgan Stanley) | Where can margins go from here? 40%+ op and FCF margins look excellent. | Chang: FCF generation was particularly strong. Op margin lift was driven by accounting amortization change + gross-margin improvement, partially offset by year 2 of SBC → cash bonus shift. Long-term GM target 80% (essentially there). Mgmt comfortable with current op-margin level; won't push further at expense of growth investment. | Well answered |
| Jackson Ader (KeyBanc) | Online churn up but revenue accelerated — net new customers strong? | Chang: Online rev +2.8% in Q1; FX-aided. Online stable longer-term; quarter-to-quarter noise. RPO non-current growth of 19% reflects longer-duration multi-product platform deals — customer-led, not Zoom pushing. | Well answered |
| Peter Weed (Bernstein) | Pricing balance between consumption-based vs per-user in Contact Center given AI deflection pressure on seats? | Chang: "Different for Zoom than legacy players." Legacy CCaaS faces shrink risk because seats are core. ZM enters CC from UC adjacency — growth, not shrink, exposure. Yuan adds: if customers hire fewer agents and more virtual agents, Zoom still wins on ZCX seats + ZVA usage. | Well answered |
| Charlie (for Peter Levine, Evercore) | Rationale for the new $1B buyback authorization on top of $370M remaining? | Chang: Investors have asked for it. $7.7B cash balance; very FCF generative; large authorization signals commitment to consistent return-of-capital. Implies a higher run-rate of repurchases. | Well answered |
| Kylie Towbin (for Tyler Radke, Citi) | Rank order the AI monetization avenues by significance? | Chang: Declined to rank — "the most important thing is to ensure that AI monetization inflects" the core business. Won't put out a single AI revenue stat. Yuan teased June product announcement. | Partially deflected |
| James Fish (Piper Sandler) | Salesforce launched native voice within CX — competitive impact? | Yuan: Salesforce is partner + customer. ZM enters CX from different angle (UC heritage, system-of-action). Chang: "Better-together" with Workplace is the durable advantage; recent CX win-backs validate this. | Adequate |
| Theme | Commentary / Mention | Read-through |
|---|---|---|
| Microsoft Teams | ZM displaced Teams calling in a 7-figure government contractor deal that came back for full Workplace + Phone + Events + Webinars | Marginally negative for MSFT enterprise voice — Teams bundling power not infinite when security/quality requirements bite. Net neutral given MSFT scale. |
| Cisco | Same gov-contractor deal also displaced Cisco calling | Negative for CSCO Webex/calling franchise — continues share donation to ZM/MSFT in voice |
| Salesforce (CRM) | SFDC launched native voice within CX; Yuan: "great customer and partner" entering from CRM angle vs ZM's UC angle | Neutral for CRM (Voice is small add-on); modest competitive overhang for ZCX but mgmt confident in differentiation |
| MongoDB (MDB) | Upgraded to Workplace Enterprise Plus + ZCC + ZVA; using Custom AI Companion for IT/CRM workflow agents | Positive customer-validation point for ZM AI monetization; neutral read-through for MDB beyond "AI adoption inside enterprise customers" |
| HubSpot (HUBS) | BrightHire (ZM company) expanded into HUBS go-to-market hiring with AI Interviewer | Positive read-through for HUBS hiring efficiency; small but signal for AI in HR workflows |
| Hugging Face | ZM Scribe API ranked among top models on the open ASR leaderboard | Validates ZM speech-recognition stack as best-in-class outside the hyperscaler labs |
| FX / Macro | Reported rev +5.5% YoY; constant-currency +4.6% — ~90bps FX tailwind. EMEA growth "predominantly driven by year-over-year FX" | Modest FX tailwind underway in CY1H26 — supportive for global SaaS reporters this print cycle |
| Customer references (Chelsea FC, Caliber Collision, Baptist Health, Raymond James, Renza-Japan) | All cited as ZM customer wins / expansions in Q1 | Validates multi-product platform thesis; Caliber Collision (1,800 sites) and Baptist Health (16,000 workers) are large-seat references |
| Pandemic-era darlings | ZM trading at 13x P/E and 3.4x EV/Rev on 40% FCF margins (per coverage screener) | Read-through to other pandemic-stigma names — quality FCF can rebuild multiples once growth re-accelerates and capital returns scale |
Data sourced from Daloopa. Document search is currently in beta; transcript and filing snippets may vary.