< All Tickers


ZM

Zoom Communications


Overview

Business Model

Financials

Thematics

Management

Valuation

Sentiment


Earnings

FY2027Q2 Preview

> FY2027Q1 Review

ZM | Earnings Review

Zoom Communications, Inc. | FY2027Q1 reported May 21, 2026 | Analysis date: May 22, 2026 | Daloopa company_id 10312
Revenue Beat
+1.2%
$1.24B vs $1.224B Street; +5.5% YoY, $14M above guide high end — best growth in recent years
Non-GAAP EPS Beat
+9.3%
$1.55 vs $1.42 Street; $0.13 above guide high end; +$0.12 YoY
Op Margin
41.1%
+130bps YoY; non-GAAP op income $509M, exceeded high end of guide by $17M
FY27 Guide Raise
+$15M / +$0.19
Rev $5.08–$5.09B (+4.4% YoY); EPS $5.96–$6.00; +$1B incremental buyback
ZM delivered a clean beat-and-raise on FY27Q1 with revenue of $1.24B (+5.5% YoY, +4.6% in constant currency) — its fastest growth in recent years and $14M above the high end of the prior guide. Non-GAAP gross margin came in at 79.9% (+70bps YoY) and non-GAAP operating margin expanded 130bps to 41.1%, producing $509M of non-GAAP operating income ($17M above the high end of guide). Non-GAAP EPS of $1.55 beat consensus by $0.13. Enterprise revenue grew 7.2% YoY to $755.7M (61% of total, +1pp YoY), trailing-twelve-month enterprise NDR ticked up to 99% from 98% — the first modest inflection — and customers >$100K TTM revenue grew 8% YoY. AI Companion paid MAUs grew 184% YoY, My Notes surpassed 1.5M MAUs four months after launch, and 15 of the top 20 deals included Workplace or Phone. Management raised both Q2 and FY27 guidance and the Board authorized an incremental $1B buyback on top of the $370M remaining.
Key Metrics Trends
Metric FY25Q1 FY25Q2 FY25Q3 FY25Q4 FY26Q1 FY26Q2 FY26Q3 FY26Q4 FY27Q1
Revenue ($M) $1.1B $1.2B $1.2B $1.2B $1.2B $1.2B $1.2B $1.2B $1.2B
Revenue ($M) YoY % - - - - +3.0% +4.6% +4.4% +5.3% +5.4%
Enterprise revenue ($M) $666M $683M $699M $707M $705M $731M $741M $757M $756M
Enterprise revenue ($M) YoY % - - - - +5.9% +7.0% +6.0% +7.1% +7.2%
Online revenue ($M) $476M $480M $479M $477M $470M $487M $488M $490M $483M
Online revenue ($M) YoY % - - - - -1.3% +1.5% +1.9% +2.7% +2.8%
Enterprise NDR (TTM) 99.0% 98.0% 98.0% 98.0% 98.0% 98.0% 98.0% 98.0% 99.0%
Non-GAAP gross margin 79.3% 78.6% 78.9% 78.8% 79.2% 79.8% 80.0% 79.8% 79.9%
Non-GAAP operating margin 40.0% 39.2% 38.9% 39.5% 39.8% 41.3% 41.2% 39.3% 41.1%
Non-GAAP diluted EPS $1.35 $1.39 $1.38 $1.41 $1.43 $1.53 $1.52 $1.44 $1.55
Non-GAAP diluted EPS YoY % - - - - +5.9% +10.1% +10.1% +2.1% +8.4%
FCF margin (non-GAAP) 49.9% 31.4% 38.9% 35.2% 39.4% 41.7% 50.0% 27.1% 40.4%

ZM is showing a modest but real inflection: revenue growth accelerated to 5.5% (FY27Q1) from 5.3% (FY26Q4), 4.4% (FY26Q3), and 4.7% (FY26Q2) — the fastest growth since the post-pandemic normalization. Enterprise NDR ticked to 99% from a year-long 98% floor. Operating margin at 41.1% and FCF margin at 40.4% are best-in-class for SaaS at this scale. The bear case (Teams bundling structural headwind, Online segment churn) is intact but partially offset by AI monetization scaling (Custom AI Companion, ZVA Receptionist, AI Services) and ZCX growing high-double-digits. Watch items: NDR inflection above 100%, AI revenue disclosure (mgmt deliberately holding back), and the FY27Q2 guide (4.1% YoY) which implies H2 deceleration the company attributes mostly to FX and tougher Online comps.

Beat/Miss

Guidance

Catalysts

Street Q&A

Contradictions

Read-Throughs

This Quarter vs Consensus
MetricConsensusActualVarianceBeat/Miss
Revenue$1,224M Street / $1,222M guide mid$1,239M+$15M / +1.2% vs Street; +$17M vs guide midBeat
Non-GAAP EPS$1.42 Street / $1.41 guide mid$1.55+$0.13 / +9.3% vs StreetBeat
Non-GAAP gross margin~79.4%79.9%+50bps vs StreetBeat
Non-GAAP operating margin~39.7%41.1%+140bps vs StreetBeat
Enterprise NDR (TTM)98%99%+1pp — first inflectionBeat
FCFn/a (FCF margin guide)$500M (40.4% margin)+8% YoYBeat

Pattern: ZM is a consistent beater on EPS (avg +9% over L8Q) with steady ~1–1.5% revenue beats. EPS beat magnitude: FY27Q1 +9.3%, FY26Q4 -3.2% (only miss in 9 quarters — and a small one tied to higher SBC absorption), FY26Q3 +5.6%, FY26Q2 +11.1%, FY26Q1 +9.2%, FY25Q4 +8.1%, FY25Q3 +5.7%, FY25Q2 +14.4%, FY25Q1 +13.5%. The FY27Q1 revenue beat of +1.2% extends the streak of 9 consecutive revenue beats (~1.0–1.6% range). NDR inflection from 98% → 99% is the strongest qualitative signal — mgmt has been telegraphing this for 3+ quarters. L12Q Beat Rate: Revenue ~92%, EPS ~92%.

Guidance Deep Dive
MetricPrior Guide (Feb 2026)New Guide (May 2026)ConsensusSignal
Revenue Q2 (FY27Q2)n/a$1,265M$1,270M (mid $1,267.5M; +4.1% YoY)$1,266MIn line with Street; implies modest deceleration from Q1's 5.5% (FX + tougher comps)
Non-GAAP EPS Q2 (FY27Q2)n/a$1.45$1.47 (mid $1.46)$1.49$0.03 below Street — conservative pattern
Revenue FY27$5,065M–$5,075M (mid $5,070M)$5,080M$5,090M (mid $5,085M; +4.4% YoY)$5,082MRaised $15M; matches Street
Non-GAAP EPS FY27$5.77–$5.81 (mid $5.79)$5.96$6.00 (mid $5.98)$5.91Raised $0.19 / +3.3%; $0.07 above Street
FY27 non-GAAP op incomen/a explicit$2.065B–$2.075B (40.7% margin)~$2.02BImplies ~+50bps op-margin lift vs FY26
FY27 free cash flow$1.70B–$1.74B$1.70B–$1.74B (reaffirmed)$1.71BUnchanged — translates to ~33.5% FCF margin
Q2 deferred revenue YoY1–2%2–3%n/aUp modestly; grace-period dynamics still cause variability
**Tone: Confident with measured language.** CFO Michelle Chang framed Q1 as "a strong start to FY27" and used "durable" 4+ times to describe enterprise revenue. CEO Eric Yuan emphasized AI as the system-of-action — paid AI was involved in 9 of the top 10 ZCX deals, MongoDB and Raymond James cited as expansion wins. The Q2 EPS guide of $1.45–$1.47 ($0.03 below Street) preserves ZM's pattern of conservative guides + beats. Importantly, mgmt **declined to break out AI revenue** in response to Citi's question — Chang said the focus is on AI monetization "inflecting" the core business rather than on AI as a standalone disclosure. Source: ZM FY27Q1 transcript (May 21, 2026).
Upcoming Catalysts
CatalystTimingConsensus / WatchImplication
June 2026 AI product releaseJune 2026Yuan teased "exciting new product/solution announcement next month, all our AI-driven product"Could re-rate Custom AI Companion narrative if quality jump is meaningful
Custom AI Companion expansionFY27 ongoingRaymond James ~10,000 seats; MongoDB upgrade; financial-services tractionMonetization path for AI inside Workplace; key to NDR > 100% thesis
ZVA Receptionist (Phone AI)FY27 ongoingAI-powered call routing; new monetization layer on Phone (mid-teens ARR growth)Adds AI ARPU lift to Phone book; key to Phone re-acceleration
Zoom AI Services (Scribe API)Launched March 2026Top open ASR leaderboard on Hugging Face; BPO/developer adoption (InflexionCX)Platform-style AI revenue with developer leverage; small base
$1B incremental buybackAuthorized May 2026On top of $370M remaining; 4.2M shares for $362M repurchased Q1; $7.7B cash$1.37B total authorization vs ~$24B mkt cap = ~5.7% — supportive of EPS
NDR inflection above 100%Watch FY27 quartersTTM Enterprise NDR ticked from 98% to 99% in Q1 — first move in 5+ quartersSingle most important fundamental signal — needed for re-rating
ZCX share gainsFY27 ongoingHigh-double-digit growth, 9 of top 10 ZCX deals included paid AIDiversification away from UC into CC TAM
FY27Q2 printLate Aug 2026Guide $1.265B–$1.27B / $1.45–$1.47 EPS — implies decel + tougher Online compWatch enterprise NDR trajectory and AI Companion paid MAU growth
Street Q&A
Analyst (firm)QuestionManagement responseAssessment
Alex Zukin (Wolfe)What changed on deferred revenue (+5% vs 1–2% guide) and broader enterprise billings trend?Chang: Enterprise diversification, churn improvement, AI monetization all driving durable enterprise growth. Deferred-rev outperformance was because fewer large competitive takeouts required grace-period structures this quarter — those terms are valuable when needed (less discount, longer deals) but mgmt won't take them if not needed. Online churn ticked up nominally to 3% — "don't read too much into it."Well answered
Siti Panigrahi (Mizuho)How much of the 5.5% revenue accel came from AI monetization vs broader enterprise activity? Why does FY27 guide imply H2 deceleration?Chang: Some of the upside was FX-driven. Enterprise grew 7.2% (vs 7.1% prior) with a 60bp white-label churn headwind — so true underlying enterprise accel. Online had FX tailwind AND an easier comp (no price increase in prior Q1) — Online decel expected Q2–Q4 of FY27.Well answered
Josh Baer (Morgan Stanley)Where can margins go from here? 40%+ op and FCF margins look excellent.Chang: FCF generation was particularly strong. Op margin lift was driven by accounting amortization change + gross-margin improvement, partially offset by year 2 of SBC → cash bonus shift. Long-term GM target 80% (essentially there). Mgmt comfortable with current op-margin level; won't push further at expense of growth investment.Well answered
Jackson Ader (KeyBanc)Online churn up but revenue accelerated — net new customers strong?Chang: Online rev +2.8% in Q1; FX-aided. Online stable longer-term; quarter-to-quarter noise. RPO non-current growth of 19% reflects longer-duration multi-product platform deals — customer-led, not Zoom pushing.Well answered
Peter Weed (Bernstein)Pricing balance between consumption-based vs per-user in Contact Center given AI deflection pressure on seats?Chang: "Different for Zoom than legacy players." Legacy CCaaS faces shrink risk because seats are core. ZM enters CC from UC adjacency — growth, not shrink, exposure. Yuan adds: if customers hire fewer agents and more virtual agents, Zoom still wins on ZCX seats + ZVA usage.Well answered
Charlie (for Peter Levine, Evercore)Rationale for the new $1B buyback authorization on top of $370M remaining?Chang: Investors have asked for it. $7.7B cash balance; very FCF generative; large authorization signals commitment to consistent return-of-capital. Implies a higher run-rate of repurchases.Well answered
Kylie Towbin (for Tyler Radke, Citi)Rank order the AI monetization avenues by significance?Chang: Declined to rank — "the most important thing is to ensure that AI monetization inflects" the core business. Won't put out a single AI revenue stat. Yuan teased June product announcement.Partially deflected
James Fish (Piper Sandler)Salesforce launched native voice within CX — competitive impact?Yuan: Salesforce is partner + customer. ZM enters CX from different angle (UC heritage, system-of-action). Chang: "Better-together" with Workplace is the durable advantage; recent CX win-backs validate this.Adequate
Contradictions
Indirect Read-Throughs
ThemeCommentary / MentionRead-through
Microsoft TeamsZM displaced Teams calling in a 7-figure government contractor deal that came back for full Workplace + Phone + Events + WebinarsMarginally negative for MSFT enterprise voice — Teams bundling power not infinite when security/quality requirements bite. Net neutral given MSFT scale.
CiscoSame gov-contractor deal also displaced Cisco callingNegative for CSCO Webex/calling franchise — continues share donation to ZM/MSFT in voice
Salesforce (CRM)SFDC launched native voice within CX; Yuan: "great customer and partner" entering from CRM angle vs ZM's UC angleNeutral for CRM (Voice is small add-on); modest competitive overhang for ZCX but mgmt confident in differentiation
MongoDB (MDB)Upgraded to Workplace Enterprise Plus + ZCC + ZVA; using Custom AI Companion for IT/CRM workflow agentsPositive customer-validation point for ZM AI monetization; neutral read-through for MDB beyond "AI adoption inside enterprise customers"
HubSpot (HUBS)BrightHire (ZM company) expanded into HUBS go-to-market hiring with AI InterviewerPositive read-through for HUBS hiring efficiency; small but signal for AI in HR workflows
Hugging FaceZM Scribe API ranked among top models on the open ASR leaderboardValidates ZM speech-recognition stack as best-in-class outside the hyperscaler labs
FX / MacroReported rev +5.5% YoY; constant-currency +4.6% — ~90bps FX tailwind. EMEA growth "predominantly driven by year-over-year FX"Modest FX tailwind underway in CY1H26 — supportive for global SaaS reporters this print cycle
Customer references (Chelsea FC, Caliber Collision, Baptist Health, Raymond James, Renza-Japan)All cited as ZM customer wins / expansions in Q1Validates multi-product platform thesis; Caliber Collision (1,800 sites) and Baptist Health (16,000 workers) are large-seat references
Pandemic-era darlingsZM trading at 13x P/E and 3.4x EV/Rev on 40% FCF margins (per coverage screener)Read-through to other pandemic-stigma names — quality FCF can rebuild multiples once growth re-accelerates and capital returns scale

Data sourced from Daloopa. Document search is currently in beta; transcript and filing snippets may vary.