< All Tickers


DASH

DoorDash, Inc.


Overview

Business Model

Financials

Thematics

Management

Valuation

Sentiment


Earnings

2026Q1 Review (Claude)

DASH | Earnings Review

DoorDash, Inc. | 2026 Q1 reported May 6, 2026 AMC | Analysis date: May 7, 2026 | Daloopa company_id 25487
Marketplace GOV
+37.0% YoY
$31.6B vs ~$31.5B Street; in-line; +1% drag from winter storms; Deliveroo consolidated (closed Q4'25)
Adj EBITDA Beat
+1.7%
$754M vs ~$741.5M Street; +27.8% YoY (dollars), but margin -17 bps of GOV — first deterioration in series
Revenue / EPS
$4.04B MISS / $0.42 BEAT
Rev -2.7% vs $4.15B (take rate -30 bps to 12.8% on Deliveroo dilution); EPS beat $0.37 by +13.5% (down -4.5% YoY despite +33% rev)
Q2'26 Guide
GOV BEAT / EBITDA in-line
GOV $32.4-33.4B mid $32.9B (+1.5% vs $32.4B Street); EBITDA $770-870M mid $820M (~$822.5M Street); stock +10% AH
Headline acceleration on Deliveroo consolidation; underlying margin quality decelerating. Q1'26 Total Orders 933M (+27.5%), Marketplace GOV $31.6B (+37.0%), Revenue $4.04B (+33.1%) — all inflated by Deliveroo (closed Q4'25). Take rate compressed to 12.8% (-30 bps YoY), lowest since Q1'24, on Deliveroo geographic/category mix dilution. Adj EBITDA $754M (+27.8% in dollars) beat ~$741M Street by +1.7%, but margin compressed -17 bps as % of GOV (first negative YoY print in series) and -78 bps as % of revenue; first sequential EBITDA dollar decline ($780M Q4'25 → $754M Q1'26). GAAP Op Income $151M -2.6%; EPS $0.42 -4.5% YoY despite +33% revenue (Deliveroo dilution + transaction costs + higher tax/SBC). Headline beats vs Street: EBITDA +1.7%, EPS +13.5% (vs $0.37); Revenue MISS -2.7% (vs ~$4.15B); GOV in-line. Stock +10% AH on Q2 GOV beat & EBITDA reaffirmation. Q2'26 guide: GOV $32.4-33.4B (mid +1.5% vs Street); Adj EBITDA $770-870M (in-line $822.5M Street). Operational drivers: US revenue $3.10B +16.9% (best US growth since 2024); International $932M +148% YoY (now 23.1% of total). DashPass/Wolt+ ~35M members (+59% YoY). FY26 framework reaffirmed: Adj EBITDA margin slightly above 2025 ex-GOV (Deliveroo $200M EBITDA contribution maintained — only <$25M in Q1, implies sharp 2H ramp); 2H'26 dollars and margin meaningfully > 1H'26. $50M/Q gas-rewards drag in Q1 + Q2 (consumer investment); replatforming on Wolt + Deliveroo means redundant 3-stack costs through '26 into early '27. Tone: as confident on demand/competitive position as past 4 quarters but slightly more conservative on GOV beat magnitude (started Q4'25 "within range" caveat). New international/FX risk language post-Deliveroo. Capital allocation: only $205M of $5B authorization repurchased YTD ($4.795B remaining). Watch: (1) New Verticals 2H'26 gross-profit-positive bar (note: downgraded from "unit-economic positive" Q4'25 framing); (2) Deliveroo $200M EBITDA contribution 2H ramp; (3) advertising scale; (4) Dot AV (in-house); (5) DashPass cross-vertical retention.
Key Metrics Trends
Metric Q1 2024 Q2 2024 Q3 2024 Q4 2024 Q1 2025 Q2 2025 Q3 2025 Q4 2025 Q1 2026
Total Orders (M) $620M $635M $643M $685M $732M $761M $776M $903M $933M
Total Orders (M) YoY % - - - - +18.1% +19.8% +20.7% +31.8% +27.5%
Marketplace GOV ($M) $19.2B $19.7B $20.0B $21.3B $23.1B $24.2B $25.0B $29.7B $31.6B
Marketplace GOV ($M) YoY % - - - - +19.9% +23.0% +25.1% +39.5% +37.0%
Total Revenue ($M) $2.5B $2.6B $2.7B $2.9B $3.0B $3.3B $3.4B $4.0B $4.0B
Total Revenue ($M) YoY % - - - - +20.7% +24.9% +27.3% +37.7% +33.1%
Adj EBITDA ($M) $371M $430M $533M $566M $590M $655M $754M $780M $754M
Adj EBITDA ($M) YoY % - - - - +59.0% +52.3% +41.5% +37.8% +27.8%
Adj EBITDA % of GOV 1.9% 2.2% 2.7% 2.7% 2.6% 2.7% 3.0% 2.6% 2.4%
Adj EBITDA % of GOV YoY chg (bps) - - - - +63 +52 +35 -3 -17
Adj EBITDA % of Revenue 14.8% 16.4% 19.7% 19.7% 19.5% 19.9% 21.9% 19.7% 18.7%
Adj EBITDA % of Revenue YoY chg (bps) - - - - +470 +360 +218 +2 -78
_Trajectory: two-phase story — headline accelerating, profit quality decelerating. Phase 1 (2024-2025Q1): clean operating leverage. Order/GOV growth ~20%, revenue ~25%, EBITDA YoY +54% to +59%, margin (% GOV) expanding +50-65 bps YoY. GAAP profitability inflected in 2024Q3. Peak quality at 2025Q1: EBITDA YoY +59%, margin +63 bps YoY — best print in series. Phase 2 deceleration starting 2025Q2: EBITDA growth halved from +59% (Q1'25) → +28% (Q1'26). Acceleration sharply negative (-670, -1,080, -370, -1,000 bps QoQ). Deliveroo distortion: 2025Q4 and 2026Q1 topline metrics inflated by acquisition; do not reflect organic acceleration. Margin rollover: EBITDA margin (% of GOV) turned negative YoY in last two quarters (-3 bps Q4'25, -17 bps Q1'26) — first deterioration in dataset. Q1'26 worst quality quarter: first sequential EBITDA dollar decline ($780M → $754M) and EPS -4.5% YoY. Verdict: Headline growth optically accelerating; underlying profit trajectory clearly decelerating. Reinvestment + Deliveroo integration cycle is masking deteriorating organic operating leverage._

Beat/Miss

Guidance

Catalysts

Street Q&A

Contradictions

Read-Throughs

This Quarter vs Consensus
MetricConsensusActualVarianceRead
Marketplace GOV ($B)~$31.5B$31.6BIn-line+37.0% YoY (Deliveroo aided)
Total Orders (M)933+27.5% YoYBeat — 2 straight Q >25% growth
Revenue ($B)~$4.15B$4.04B-$0.11B / -2.7%MISS — take-rate compression
Adj EBITDA~$741.5M$754M+$12.5M / +1.7%Beat — but margin -17 bps GOV
GAAP EPS~$0.37$0.42+$0.05 / +13.5%Beat — but -4.5% YoY
Adj EBITDA % of GOV2.39%-17 bps YoYFirst negative YoY print in series
Take Rate (Net Rev Margin)12.8%-30 bps YoYLowest since Q1'24 — Deliveroo mix
L8Q Adj EBITDA beat rate8/8 = 100%Sell-side persistently underestimates leverage
L8Q Total Orders beat rate7/8 = 88%Demand never misses
L8Q GOV beat rate100% beat-or-in-line (3 beats / 5 in-line)Consistent
L8Q Revenue beat rate5/8 = 63%Take-rate/mix issues
L4Q EBITDA beat rate4/4 = 100%Consistent Beater
L4Q Revenue beat rate2/4 = 50%Mixed
Pattern: Operational beater (Orders + EBITDA) but profit-quality deceleration the new wrinkle. Adj EBITDA beat 8/8 quarters; Total Orders 7/8; GOV 100% beat-or-in-line. Revenue beats lumpier (5/8) on take-rate/mix. EPS beats 4/8 on volatile below-the-line items (especially Q3'25 / Q4'25 around Deliveroo close). Q1'26 was unusual: Revenue MISS but EBITDA & EPS BEAT — ad/grocery upside + push of replatforming investments H1→H2. Mgmt explanation Q1'26: ~1% GOV drag from winter storms; $50M gas-rewards consumer investment introduced in Q1, extended in Q2. EBITDA still beat because Ravi pushed platform/replatforming investments from H1 to H2. FY framework reaffirmed: slightly higher margin ex-GOV vs 2025; ~$200M EBITDA from Deliveroo (only <$25M in Q1, implies sharp 2H ramp). Stock +10% AH on Q2 GOV beat + framework reaffirmation.
Guidance Deep Dive
MetricPrior Guide / TrendNew Guide RangeNew Guide MidStreet Pre-Printvs Priorvs Street
Q2'26 Marketplace GOV ($B)n/a (1Q forward)$32.4-33.4B$32.9B$32.4Bn/a+$0.5B / +1.5%
Q2'26 Adj EBITDA ($M)n/a (1Q forward)$770-870M$820M$822.5Mn/a~In-line
Q1'26 calibration: GOV$31.0-31.8B (prior guide)$31.6B (high end)
Q1'26 calibration: Adj EBITDA$675-775M (prior guide)$754M (high end)
FY26 Adj EBITDA Margin (ex-GOV ex-Deliveroo)Slightly higher vs FY25Slightly higher vs FY25Reaffirmed
FY26 Deliveroo EBITDA contribution$200M$200M (only <$25M in Q1)ReaffirmedSharp 2H ramp implied
FY26 H2 vs H1Dollars + margin meaningfully higher
FY26 Gas Rewards drag$50M/Q in Q1 & Q2Open-ended into 2H
FY26 New VerticalsUnit-economic positive 2H (Q4'25)Gross profit positive 2HGoalpost downgrade
FY26 International segment profitabilityGross profit positive → near contribution breakevenContribution profit positive 2H'26Consistent ladder
FY26 Replatforming costsThrough '26, partial bleed 2027Redundant 3-stack costs
Buyback ($5B authorization)$205M YTD$4.795B remainingModest pace
Tone: as confident on demand/competitive position as past 4 quarters but slightly more conservative on GOV beat magnitude. Started in Q4'25 with the unusual "within range" caveat. New risk language elevated around international/FX exposure post-Deliveroo. Gas relief drag of ~$50M/Q is the main near-term EBITDA headwind and is open-ended into 2H. Wolt/Deliveroo integration on track: in production-traffic phase; redundant tech-stack costs run through '26 into early '27. Deliveroo "highest growth in 4 years and reaccelerating monthly"; Wolt "highest share performance in each country." Margin watch: first sequential EBITDA dollar decline ($780M → $754M); first negative YoY EBITDA-margin-of-GOV print. Mgmt argues this is reinvestment + Deliveroo integration timing (2H ramp), not a structural break. Notable absence: Q1 transcript did not directly address $5B buyback execution, CA Prop 22, EU Platform Work Directive, or tariffs. Macro framed as benign (MAU all-time high, ~1% Q1 GOV drag from winter storms only). Disciplined messaging: many phrases repeat verbatim across calls (e.g., "$200M Deliveroo," "slightly above 2025 ex-GOV").
Upcoming Catalysts
#CatalystTimingWhat to WatchRead
1New Verticals gross-profit positive 2H 20262H 2026Goalpost downgraded from "unit-economic positive" (Q4'25) to "gross profit positive" (Q1'26)Most concrete near-term catalyst — but bar lowered
2DashPass record subscription growthThrough FY26Cross-brand growth (DoorDash, Wolt, Deliveroo); ~35M members Q4'25 (+59% YoY)Lock-in flywheel
3Advertising at "record high"Through FY26SMB, enterprise, CPG unlocking; off-site expansion aheadHigh-margin growth wedge
4Replatforming on Wolt + DeliverooThrough '26, partial bleed 2027Redundant 3-stack costs; production-traffic phaseCost overhang
5DoorDash Dot (autonomous)Early innings, 2026 hardening yearIn-house build; not '26 P&L driverLong-term moat
6Gas-rewards $50M/Q dragQ1+Q2 2026 confirmed; open-ended 2HConsumer investment; offset by H1→H2 platform investment shiftMargin watch-item
7Grocery share leadership extendingThrough FY261-of-2 new-to-category grocery customers; volume share leader vs CARTNEGATIVE for CART
8DashMart Fulfillment ServicesDeliberately slow scaleHandful of partners onlyOptionality
9Deliveroo reaccelerating to highest growth in 4 yearsThrough FY26$200M EBITDA contribution implies sharp 2H ramp (only <$25M in Q1)Integration tailwind
10Wolt gaining share in every countryThrough FY26Highest share performance in each countryEuropean wedge vs Uber Eats / Just Eat
11Q2'26 GOV beat magnitudeAug 2026$32.4-33.4B vs $32.4B Street; in-line orders growthConfirms Q1'26 print read
12FY26 EBITDA margin (ex-GOV) slightly above 2025Through FY262H ramp confirmation; Deliveroo accretionReaffirmed
13International contribution profit positive 2H'262H 2026Wolt + Deliveroo profitability ladderSequential improvement
14$5B buyback ($4.795B remaining)Multi-yearPace ($205M YTD modest); M&A optionalitySlow pace
15Competitive — Uber Eats Europe (DoorDash + Prosus)OngoingDASH gaining share in every market via Wolt + DeliverooNEGATIVE for UBER Eats Europe
16AI / Agentic delivery (Apple, OpenAI, Anthropic, Google)Long-termTop-of-funnel only per Tony; Google Food Ordering 8-yr failure cited as analogDASH dismissive
17Tariffs / regulatoryFY26Not directly addressed on Q1 callTail risk
Street Q&A
#Analyst (Firm)TopicMgmt ResponseQuality
1Multiple analysts (Wolfe, MoffettNathanson, Goldman, Truist)Q1 print and macro setupTony/Ravi: ~1% GOV drag from winter storms; $50M gas-rewards consumer investment; MAU all-time high; benign demand backdrop.Well Answered — quantified
2Multiple analystsReplatforming on Wolt + DeliverooOn track, in production-traffic phase; redundant tech-stack costs run through '26, partial bleed early '27.Well Answered — concrete timeline
3Multiple analystsInternational / Competition (Uber Eats Europe)Deliveroo "highest growth in 4 years and reaccelerating monthly"; Wolt "highest share performance in each country."Well Answered — share metrics
4Multiple analystsMacro / gas rewards / margins$50M/Q gas rewards drag in Q1 & Q2 (extended); FY26 EBITDA framework unchanged ($200M from GOV, slightly higher margin ex-GOV vs 2025); 2H > 1H.Well Answered — full bridge
5Multiple analystsHeadcount / AI productivity~2/3 of code now AI-written; productivity improving; reinvested in growth initiatives.Well Answered — quantified
6Multiple analystsOrder growth — Deliveroo distortionTony: 933M orders +27.5% YoY; Q1'26 reflects Deliveroo consolidation; underlying demand resilient.Well Answered — clarified
7Multiple analystsNew Verticals / Grocery share leadership1-of-2 new-to-category grocery customers; volume share leader vs CART; New Verticals gross-profit positive 2H 2026 (downgraded from "unit-economic positive").Soft goalpost downgrade
8Multiple analystsMerchant tools / DoorDash for Business / CateringReaffirmed product roadmap; SMB & enterprise tools expanding.Well Answered
9Multiple analystsAdvertising — record highAll three pillars (SMB, enterprise, CPG) unlocking; off-site expansion ahead. Light on off-site mechanics.Partial — strategic, not specific
10Khajuria (Bernstein)Travel-adjacency partnershipsPivoted to generic "best-of-breed membership" framing.Deflection
11Morton (MoffettNathanson)DoorDash Dot AV TAM and cost-to-serveRavi qualitative-only response; "only way to learn is by doing." Steph Curry analogy on demo-vs-scale gap.Deflection — qualitative only
12Post (BofA)Third-party agentic ad monetizationTony explicitly punted: "you'll have to ask them."Hard deflection
13Walmsley (KeyBanc)Ad syndication specifics (off-site mechanics)Answered 1P ads, light on off-site mechanics.Partial
Contradictions
#TopicSeverityStatement AStatement BWhy it's a tension
1New Verticals profitability targetMedium — goalpost downgradeQ4'25 (Ravi): "I expect our entire retail and grocery business to be unit economic positive in the second half of the year"Q1'26 (Ravi): "Last call, I made the point that we expect the overall new vertical portfolio to be gross profit positive in the second half"Gross profit positive is a weaker bar than unit-economic positive in DASH's stack. Either a verbal slip or a quiet goalpost downgrade — worth probing on Q2 call. Most material messaging tension across 4 transcripts.
2DashPass / Wolt+ penetration targetLow — never quantifiedNo quantitative target ever givenConsistent "tiny fraction of occasions" framingNot a contradiction; intentional non-disclosure.
3Advertising contributionLow — directional onlyConsistent "growing fast / reinvest dollars"No hard contribution targetDisciplined non-disclosure; no contradiction.
4Wolt + Deliveroo synergiesNone — repeated verbatim$200M EBITDA contribution Q3, Q4, Q1Identical phrasing across calls.
5Adj EBITDA margin targetNone — repeated verbatim"Up slightly vs 2025 ex-Deliveroo" repeated 3 callsDisciplined.
6Capital allocation / buyback paceLow — not discussed substantivelyNot discussed in any of 4 callsNotable silence.
7International segment profitabilityConsistent ladderQ3'25: gross-profit positive → close to contribution breakevenQ4'25/Q1'26: contribution profit positive 2H'26Monotonic improvement framing.
8Competitive landscapeUniformly dismissiveGoogle Food Ordering analogy verbatim Q4'25 + Q1'26Consistent dismissiveness of agentic/search platforms.
Indirect Read-Throughs
NameRelationshipWhat DASH signaledRead-through
Instacart (CART)Direct grocery delivery competitorDASH gaining 1-of-2 new-to-category grocery delivery customers; volume share leaderNEGATIVE — clear share take
Uber Eats (UBER) — EuropeDirect competitor (international)DASH (Wolt + Deliveroo) claims share gains in every market; Deliveroo at fastest growth in 4 yearsNEGATIVE for UBER Eats Europe
Lyft (LYFT)DashPass partnerDashPass partnership extended/expandedPOSITIVE
Serve / Nuro / CocoAV delivery competitorsDASH building Dot in-house; "the only way... is if you actually get in there and do all of the things yourself"; Steph Curry demo-vs-scale analogyNEGATIVE — DASH not partnering, building in-house
Google (GOOGL)Agentic search platformGoogle Food Ordering's 8-year failure to retain users cited as analog; framed as top-of-funnel onlyNEGATIVE — DASH dismissive
Apple / OpenAI / AnthropicAgentic platformsTop-of-funnel only; not threats to end-to-end commerce ownershipStrategic dismissal
Amazon (AMZN)End-to-end commerce analogCited as positive analog for owning end-to-end commercePOSITIVE framing
Just Eat / Delivery HeroEuropean competitors (unmentioned)Notably absent — no commentaryNeutral
Walmart / Kroger / Target / Amazon FreshGrocery competitorsNot named — DashMart Fulfillment Services with handful of partners onlyImplicit competitive dynamic
Restaurant chains (MCD, SBUX, CMG, WING, DPZ, CAVA, SG)CustomersNo individual restaurant chain mentioned by nameNotable absence
UBER (Mobility)Gig labor analogDASH gas-rewards $50M/Q drag — gig labor cost pressure (negative read for UBER labor economics)NEGATIVE for UBER (labor cost trends)
Progressive (PGR) / Allstate (ALL)Auto insurance — gas-rewards adjacencyIndirect: DASH passing-through gas savingsNeutral
Wolt / Deliveroo (subsidiaries)Owned internationalDeliveroo highest growth in 4 years; Wolt highest share in each countryPOSITIVE — integration on track

Data sourced from Daloopa. Document search is currently in beta; transcript and filing snippets may vary.