< All Tickers


BLK

BlackRock, Inc.


Overview

Business Model

Financials

Thematics

Management

Valuation

Sentiment


Earnings

> 2026Q1 Review

BLK | Earnings Review

BlackRock, Inc. | 2026Q1 reported April 14, 2026 | Analysis date: April 28, 2026 | Daloopa company_id 297
Revenue
$6.70B
+27% YoY; markets, HPS, tech, and organic growth
Adjusted EPS
$14.06
+46% YoY on the Daloopa EPS series
Net Inflows
$130B
Record first quarter for iShares ETFs
Adj. Op Margin
44.5%
+130 bps YoY; still absorbing acquisitions
BLK's Q1 was a scale-and-flow quarter, but the first draft did not go deep enough on where the flow quality came from. Revenue reached $6.70B, adjusted EPS reached $14.06, and adjusted operating margin held at 44.5%. The transcript makes the important nuance clear: $130B of total net inflows was led by record iShares flows, but the higher-value growth engines were Aperio, SpiderRock, active ETFs, HPS/private credit, infrastructure, and Aladdin/Preqin. The offset was concentrated low-fee institutional index-equity outflows, so the quarter was better than a simple AUM-beta story.
Key Metrics Trends
Metric Q1 2024 Q2 2024 Q3 2024 Q4 2024 Q1 2025 Q2 2025 Q3 2025 Q4 2025 Q1 2026
Total revenue $4.7B $4.8B $5.2B $5.7B $5.3B $5.4B $6.5B $7.0B $6.7B
Total revenue YoY % - - - - +11.6% +12.9% +25.2% +23.4% +27.0%
Advisory/admin/securities lending revenue $3.8B $3.9B $4.0B $4.4B $4.4B $4.5B $5.0B $5.3B $5.4B
Advisory/admin/securities lending revenue YoY % - - - - +16.5% +14.9% +25.2% +19.5% +23.6%
Performance fees $204M $164M $388M $451M $60M $94M $516M $754M $272M
Performance fees YoY % - - - - -70.6% -42.7% +33.0% +67.2% +353.3%
Technology services revenue $377M $395M $403M $428M $436M $499M $515M $531M $530M
Technology services revenue YoY % - - - - +15.6% +26.3% +27.8% +24.1% +21.6%
Adjusted diluted EPS $10.48 $9.99 $10.90 $10.63 $9.64 $10.19 $8.43 $7.16 $14.06
Adjusted diluted EPS YoY % - - - - -8.0% +2.0% -22.7% -32.6% +45.9%
Adjusted operating margin 42.2% 44.1% 45.8% 45.5% 43.2% 43.3% 44.6% 45.0% 44.5%
Adjusted operating margin YoY chg (bps) - - - - +100 -80 -120 -50 +130

BlackRock's revenue base has stepped up with markets, acquisitions, and organic flow strength. The debate is less about Q1 execution and more about whether the broader platform can keep converting flows into higher-fee growth.

This Quarter vs Consensus
MetricPrior / Street FrameActualVarianceRead
RevenueDouble-digit growth expected$6.70B+27% YoYStrong
Adjusted EPSHigher operating income expected$14.06Well above prior yearClean operating leverage
Total net inflowsFlow recovery expected$130BStrongCore stock debate improves
iShares net inflowsETF leadership watched$132BRecord first quarterVery positive
Retail net inflowsWealth channel durability$15BNine straight positive quartersAperio / tax-aware demand matters
Private markets net inflowsAlternatives fundraising watched$9BLed by private credit and infrastructureHigher-fee mix support
Technology services revenueAladdin / Preqin growth$530M+22% YoYStrategic mix improving

The quarter had both operating and strategic quality: revenue growth, margin, EPS, and net flows all pointed in the same direction.

Guidance Deep Dive
MetricPrior / FrameworkCurrent CommentChangeImplication
Net inflowsSustained organic growth$130B in Q1; $744B LTMPositive updateOrganic growth remains broad
Organic base fee growthHigh-quality flow mix8% in Q1; 10% LTMStrongETF and private-market mix matters
Wealth / direct indexingTax-aware SMA adoptionAperio record $13B inflows; SpiderRock $1B+Understated in first draftHigh-value wealth channel is accelerating
Private marketsHPS / infrastructure / ELTIF momentumHPS flagship BDC April subscriptions about $150MConstructivePrivate-credit distribution is scaling
Technology servicesAladdin plus Preqin22% YoY growthConstructiveData and tech contribution rising
Capital returnDividend and buyback discipline$450M repurchased; dividend +10%SupportiveCash return stays active

Note: Document search is currently in beta. Results may vary. BlackRock does not give a simple EPS guidance range; the operative guideposts are flows, organic base fee growth, tech services, integration, and capital return.

Upcoming Catalysts
CatalystTimingWhat To WatchBull CaseBear Case
ETF flowsMonthly / quarterlyCore, bond, active, and digital-asset ETF demandRecord iShares momentum compounds fee growthRisk-off market reduces asset-linked revenue
Private markets integration2026HPS, GIP, and private credit fundraisingBlackRock scales higher-fee alternativesIntegration costs and realization cycles dilute margins
Aladdin and Preqin2026ACV growth and cross-sellTechnology/data becomes a bigger growth pillarClient budget scrutiny slows enterprise sales
Operating marginQuarterlyExpense discipline after acquisitionsScale absorbs integration costsMix and integration pressure margins
Street Q&A
TopicLikely Street QuestionAnswer / Read
FlowsAre $130B of inflows repeatable?The better question is mix. ETF flows were excellent, but the more valuable read-through was Aperio, active ETFs, private credit, and infrastructure.
Private marketsHow much is acquired versus organic?Both matter now. The call framed BlackRock as a public markets, private markets, and technology platform; private-market net inflows and realizations are the real proof points.
Tech servicesIs Aladdin reaccelerating?Daloopa document snippets point to 22% technology services revenue growth and 14% ACV growth; Preqin makes the public/private market workflow more important than legacy Aladdin alone.
MarginsCan margins expand with acquisitions?Q1 margin was solid, but the next phase depends on integration efficiency and mix shift toward higher-fee products.
Contradictions
TopicView 1View 2Explainer
Flows vs fee qualityDaloopa documents show $130B of Q1 net inflows and record $132B iShares inflows.Management also described institutional active outflows concentrated in low-fee index equities.The right KPI is organic base-fee growth, not headline net inflows alone.
Revenue growth vs integration proofRevenue rose to $6.70B.Growth includes acquired private-markets and data assets.BlackRock is a stronger platform, but HPS, GIP, and Preqin still need to prove durable margin and cross-sell benefits.
Private-markets upside vs lumpinessPrivate-markets net inflows were $9B.Private-market AUM also has realizations and performance-fee lumpiness.The strategy is positive, but quarterly fees will not be linear.
Wealth channel strength vs market betaAperio generated record $13B inflows and SpiderRock added more than $1B.Those channels still depend on advisor demand, tax sensitivity, and equity-market levels.This is a mix upgrade, not an immunity shield.
Indirect Read-Throughs
Company / ThemeRead-ThroughWhy It Matters
Asset managersPositiveFlow appetite and fee growth were broad, not just market beta.
MSCI / SPGI indicesPositiveETF demand supports index-linked economics across the ecosystem.
Private credit managersPositiveBlackRock highlighted private credit and infrastructure inflows.
Financial softwareConstructiveAladdin and Preqin strength supports demand for risk/data platforms.

Data sourced from Daloopa. Document search is currently in beta; transcript and filing snippets may vary.